Sportsbooks · By State · Updated June 2026

Online Sports Betting by State: Legal States Tracker

This tracker covers every U.S. state and Washington, D.C.: where online sports betting is legal and live, where betting is limited to retail locations, where it is banned outright, and which states could legalize next. Each legal state listing includes its launch date, regulator, tax rate, betting age, available sportsbooks and college betting rules. Laws change often, so always confirm the current rules with your state regulator before you bet.

Published On:

June 29th, 2026

Tim Stewart

Tim Stewart

Keyword Research, Link Building, Conversion Rate Optimization

Keyword Research, Link Building, Conversion Rate Optimization

Published: June 29th, 2026
Overview

How Sports Betting Legality Works in the U.S.

There is no single national law that legalizes or bans sports betting across the country. Each state decides whether and how to allow it within its own borders, which is why the map is a patchwork: some states offer full statewide mobile betting, some allow only in-person wagering, and some prohibit it entirely. Online sports betting accounts for the large majority of legal wagering in the United States. For the picture across every gambling type, see whether online gambling is legal, or our main online sportsbooks guide.

The End of PASPA: How 2018 Changed Everything

Until 2018, a federal law called the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act, or PASPA, effectively banned sports betting outside Nevada. In May 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down PASPA in Murphy v. NCAA, ruling that the federal government could not compel states to prohibit sports betting. That decision returned the choice to each state, and legal markets have launched nearly every year since. New Jersey, which brought the case, became the first state to launch online sports betting in August 2018.

Three Tiers: Online, Retail-Only, and No Betting

At the highest level, states fall into three groups. The largest has legal online or mobile sports betting available statewide through licensed apps, often alongside retail sportsbooks. A smaller group permits only retail betting, meaning in-person wagers at casinos, tribal venues or lottery terminals, with no statewide mobile option. A third group has no legal sports betting at all. As of June 2026, roughly 30 states plus Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico offer online betting, several more offer retail-only betting, and 11 states have no legal sports betting in any form. Within those tiers, the details vary enough that it helps to break legal betting into five distinct models, covered in the next section.

How Regulators License and Audit Sportsbooks

In legal states, operators must be licensed before taking bets. The licensing body is usually a state gaming commission, lottery or racing commission. Operators typically must pass background checks, demonstrate financial stability, pay licensing fees, implement geolocation and identity verification, and provide responsible gambling tools. Regulators audit operators on an ongoing basis, publish monthly handle and revenue reports, monitor for integrity issues, and can fine or suspend a license for violations. Many states also coordinate with leagues and integrity monitors to flag suspicious betting patterns, and some maintain public exclusion lists barring specific individuals from wagering.

Quick Check

States Without Online Sports Betting

19 States Have No Statewide Online Sports Betting
Of these, 11 have no legal sports betting at all, while 8 allow only retail, tribal or on-site wagering with no statewide mobile app. California and Texas alone make up roughly 22 percent of the U.S. adult population.
No legal sports betting at all (11)
Legal, but no statewide online betting (8)
Everywhere else, statewide mobile betting is available. See the retail and tribal-only states and the full no-betting breakdown below for each state’s outlook.
Models

The Five Models of Legal Sports Betting

“Legal” does not mean the same thing in every state. There are five distinct models, and knowing which one applies tells you whether you can bet from your couch, whether you have a choice of apps, and where the bet is legally considered to take place.

1. Full Online With Multiple Operators

The most competitive model. Players choose from many competing apps statewide, with operators tied to in-state casinos or racetracks. New Jersey is the classic example, with well over a dozen online brands. This model produces the most handle, the best promotions and the sharpest odds for bettors.

2. Online With a Single Operator

A government or lottery-backed monopoly in which the state contracts with one platform for statewide mobile betting. Examples include Oregon and New Hampshire (both DraftKings), Rhode Island and, until recently, Delaware. Bettors get convenience but no competition, which usually means fewer promotions and less favorable pricing.

3. Tribal-Only Mobile

Betting tied strictly to tribal-state gaming compacts, where mobile apps are geofenced to sovereign tribal land. Washington is the clearest example: commercial apps only unlock when you are physically on tribal property. Wisconsin is moving toward a hub-and-spoke version that would route statewide bets through servers on tribal land.

4. On-Premise Mobile (Non-Tribal)

Mobile wagering is technically legal, but the app only functions while you are physically inside a licensed casino, racetrack or lottery venue. Mississippi and Montana’s lottery-run app are the main examples. There is no true statewide mobile betting.

5. Retail-Only (In-Person)

Wagering is restricted entirely to physical brick-and-mortar sportsbooks. This generates a fraction of the revenue of a full online market. Examples include New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Nebraska.

Process

How a State Legalizes Sports Betting

Most states follow a similar path from idea to live market. Understanding the steps explains why some states take years and why a bill passing is not the same as betting going live.

  1. Bill drafted and filed. A lawmaker introduces a bill or joint resolution spelling out who can offer sports betting, where, and how it will be taxed.
  2. Committee hearings. One or more committees take testimony from regulators, tribes, leagues and problem-gambling groups.
  3. Chamber votes. Each legislative chamber must pass the bill, sometimes by a two-thirds majority when the state constitution bars gambling and an amendment is required.
  4. Governor action. The governor signs or vetoes. In some states the governor also renegotiates tribal compacts before signing.
  5. Voter referendum (sometimes). Where a constitutional amendment is needed, voters must approve it at the ballot box, as in Missouri, and as Texas and others would require.
  6. Rulemaking. Regulators set licensing fees, integrity-monitoring rules, tax-reporting forms and self-exclusion portals.
  7. Soft launch and full launch. Operators run a limited beta test, then open statewide once regulators sign off.
  8. Ongoing audits. Annual and monthly reports detail handle, gross gaming revenue, hold percentage and tax receipts, and regulators update rules as needed.
Reference

Legal Status of All 50 States Plus D.C.

The table below shows where every U.S. state and Washington, D.C., stands on sports betting as of June 2026: whether statewide online betting is available, whether retail betting exists, the minimum age, and the overall status. “On-site,” “terminals” and “tribal only” in the Online column mean there is no true statewide mobile betting.

Available Limited / pending Not available
StateOnlineRetailAgeOverall Status
AlabamaNoNoNo legal sports betting
AlaskaNoNoNo legal sports betting
ArizonaYesYes21Legal, online live
ArkansasYesYes21Legal, online live
CaliforniaNoNoNo legal sports betting
ColoradoYesYes21Legal, online live
ConnecticutYesYes21Legal, online live
DelawareYesYes21Legal, online live (single operator)
FloridaYesYes21Legal, online live (Hard Rock Bet only)
GeorgiaNoNoNo legal sports betting
HawaiiNoNoNo legal sports betting
IdahoNoNoNo legal sports betting
IllinoisYesYes21Legal, online live
IndianaYesYes21Legal, online live
IowaYesYes21Legal, online live
KansasYesYes21Legal, online live
KentuckyYesYes18Legal, online live
LouisianaYesYes21Legal, online live (parish by parish)
MaineYesYes21Legal, online live
MarylandYesYes21Legal, online live
MassachusettsYesYes21Legal, online live
MichiganYesYes21Legal, online live
MinnesotaNoNoNo legal sports betting
MississippiOn-site onlyYes21Retail and on-site mobile only
MissouriYesYes21Legal, recently launched
MontanaTerminals onlyYes18Retail and lottery-terminal only
NebraskaNoYes21Retail only
NevadaYesYes21Legal, online live (in-person registration)
New HampshireYesYes18Legal, online live (single operator)
New JerseyYesYes21Legal, online live
New MexicoNoYes21Retail only (tribal)
New YorkYesYes21Legal, online live
North CarolinaYesYes21Legal, online live
North DakotaNoYes21Retail only (tribal)
OhioYesYes18Legal, online live
OklahomaNoNoNo legal sports betting
OregonYesYes21Legal, online live (single operator)
PennsylvaniaYesYes21Legal, online live
Rhode IslandYesYes18Legal, online live
South CarolinaNoNoNo legal sports betting
South DakotaNoYes21Retail only (Deadwood and tribal)
TennesseeYesNo21Legal, online only
TexasNoNoNo legal sports betting
UtahNoNoNo legal sports betting
VermontYesNo21Legal, online only
VirginiaYesYes21Legal, online live
WashingtonTribal onlyYes18Retail and tribal-only mobile
Washington, D.C.YesYes18Legal, online live
West VirginiaYesYes21Legal, online live
WisconsinPendingYes21Retail live, statewide mobile legalized 2026
WyomingYesNo18Legal, online only
Comparison

Legal Online States Compared

The states with statewide online sports betting differ in launch date, regulator, tax rate and how many sportsbooks compete. The table below compares them at a glance. Tax rates are on operator revenue unless noted.

StateOnline LaunchRegulatorOperator Tax RateSportsbooks
Arizona2021Department of Gaming10%About 14
Arkansas2022Racing Commission13% to 20%Up to 8 allowed
Colorado2020Division of Gaming10%About 14
Connecticut2021Dept. of Consumer Protection13.75%3
Delaware2024State LotteryRevenue share (~50%)1 (BetRivers)
Florida2023Seminole compact / FGCCCompact terms1 (Hard Rock Bet)
Illinois2020Gaming Board20% to 40% graduated, plus per-wager feeAbout 10
Indiana2019Gaming Commission9.5%About 11
Iowa2019Racing and Gaming Commission6.75%About 11
Kansas2022Racing and Gaming Commission10%About 7
Kentucky2023Horse Racing Commission14.25% onlineAbout 8
Louisiana2022Gaming Control Board21.5% onlineAbout 8
Maine2023Gambling Control Unit10%2
Maryland2022Lottery and Gaming15%About 11
Massachusetts2023Gaming Commission20% online7
Michigan2021Gaming Control Board8.4%About 12
Missouri2025Gaming Commission10%Multiple
Nevada2010Gaming Control Board6.75%Multiple
New Hampshire2019Lottery Commission51%1 (DraftKings)
New Jersey2018Division of Gaming EnforcementAbout 21% onlineAbout 14
New York2022State Gaming Commission51%9
North Carolina2024State Lottery Commission18%Up to 12
Ohio2023Casino Control Commission20%About 13
Oregon2019State LotteryRevenue share (~51%)1 (DraftKings)
Pennsylvania2019Gaming Control Board36%About 10
Rhode Island2019State Lottery51%1, second launching 2026
Tennessee2020Sports Wagering Council1.85% of handleAbout 11
Vermont2024Dept. of Liquor and Lottery20% or more of revenue3
Virginia2021Lottery15%Multiple
Washington, D.C.2020Office of Lottery and Gaming20% to 30%5
West Virginia2018Lottery Commission10%Multiple
Wyoming2021Gaming Commission10%5
Market Data

The Sports Betting Market at a Glance

The U.S. is the largest single-country regulated sports betting market in the world. In 2025, regulated sportsbooks processed roughly $165 billion in total handle, the industry term for total dollars wagered, generated about $16.8 billion in gross gaming revenue at a national hold rate around 10 percent, and contributed roughly $3.66 billion in state tax revenue. Through the first quarter of 2026, sportsbooks had already processed more than $40 billion in handle, putting the industry on pace for another record year. Across all forms of commercial gaming, the broader industry supports around 1.8 million jobs and produces tens of billions in annual tax and tribal revenue.

Biggest Markets by Handle

The market is heavily concentrated. Ten states accounted for roughly 69 percent of all U.S. wagers in 2025. New York leads by a wide margin, with bettors wagering more than $26 billion in 2025, the highest annual handle of any state, anchored by its dense population, 11 major professional sports franchises and a mature multi-operator market. Illinois has emerged as the clear second market, with adjusted gross receipts crossing $2.25 billion and a sustained billion-dollar monthly handle, followed by New Jersey, Ohio and Arizona rounding out the top five.

Operator Market Share

Two operators dominate nationally. FanDuel leads on handle and revenue with roughly 43 to 44 percent of the U.S. market, followed by DraftKings at around 36 percent. The two together account for the large majority of all U.S. sports betting activity, combining for 70 to 80 percent of handle or revenue in many states. BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics (which acquired PointsBet’s U.S. assets), ESPN BET (Penn Entertainment), bet365 and BetRivers make up most of the competitive remainder, though their footprints and market shares vary widely by state.

National Tax Revenue

State tax revenue is as concentrated as the handle. New York alone collected roughly $1.3 billion in sports betting tax in 2025, more than the next four largest states combined, a reflection of both its market size and its 51 percent tax rate, the highest in the country alongside New Hampshire and Rhode Island. Tax revenue typically funds education, responsible gambling programs, and in some states general funds or specific initiatives such as Colorado’s water conservation projects.

Limited

Retail-Only and Tribal-Only States

The states below allow legal sports betting but do not offer true statewide mobile wagering. Bettors generally must place wagers in person, or in some cases use an app only while physically on casino or tribal property.

Mississippi

Mississippi legalized sports betting in 2017, with the first bets in 2018, and offers betting at licensed casinos along the Gulf Coast and Mississippi River. The state allows mobile betting only while you are physically on the premises of a licensed casino. The state House passed statewide-mobile bills in 2026, including HB 4074 by a wide margin, but they died in the Senate Gaming Committee. With the committee chairman opposed through 2028, statewide mobile is unlikely before the 2027 session at the earliest.

RegulatorOfficial site

Montana

Montana legalized sports betting in 2019 through the state lottery, launching Sports Bet Montana in March 2020. Betting is available only through lottery terminals and an app that functions inside authorized locations such as bars and restaurants, not statewide. Betting age is 18.

RegulatorOfficial site

Nebraska

Nebraska legalized retail sports betting after voters approved casino gaming at licensed racetracks in 2020, with in-person betting beginning in 2023 at WarHorse Lincoln and expanding to other racetrack casinos. Online betting is not yet available. A well-funded 2026 ballot push, backed by DraftKings and FanDuel, aims to authorize mobile wagering on the November ballot, with proposed language banning in-game and prop bets on in-state college teams.

RegulatorOfficial site

New Mexico

New Mexico never passed a specific sports betting law, but several tribes have offered in-person betting at their casinos since 2018 by interpreting their Class III gaming compacts to include sports wagering. The result is retail tribal sportsbooks only, with no statewide online option and little legislative movement toward one.

North Dakota

North Dakota allows retail sports betting at tribal casinos under Class III compacts, which also permit on-reservation mobile betting while physically on tribal land. There is no statewide mobile option, and the legislature again rejected expansion in 2025. Tribal gaming oversight applies.

South Dakota

South Dakota voters approved a 2020 constitutional amendment allowing sports betting only in Deadwood and, by extension, on tribal lands. Retail sportsbooks in Deadwood began taking bets in 2021, and some tribal casinos followed. The constitution’s narrow language makes statewide mobile a heavy lift.

RegulatorOfficial site

Washington

Washington allows sports betting only at tribal casinos under Class III compacts. Select tribal apps offer mobile betting, but only while you are physically inside a tribal gaming facility; there is no commercial statewide mobile market, and online gambling outside the tribal framework is a felony. In March 2026, Senate Bill 6137 lifted the ban on betting on in-state college teams at tribal books, while keeping bans on local college player props and on bets about in-game coaching or officiating decisions. The Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to tribal exclusivity.

RegulatorOfficial site

Wisconsin

Wisconsin’s tribal casinos have offered retail betting since the Oneida Nation took the first wager in November 2021, with tribal apps geofenced to tribal land. On April 9, 2026, Governor Evers signed Assembly Bill 601, legalizing statewide mobile betting through a hub-and-spoke framework that routes bets through servers on tribal land, making Wisconsin the 33rd state to allow the practice. The statewide market is not yet live, pending compact negotiations with all 11 tribes; a contested clause guarantees tribes a 60 percent share of digital revenue.

RegulatorOfficial site

No Betting

States With No Legal Sports Betting

Eleven states have no legal sports betting of any kind as of June 2026. For each, the notes below cover the current status, the most recent legislation, the key obstacle and a realistic outlook. Together, California and Texas represent roughly 22 percent of the U.S. adult population, making them by far the largest untapped markets in the country.

Alabama

No legal sports betting. A 2026 constitutional amendment, SB 257, would have bundled a lottery, casinos and sports betting under a new gaming commission, but it never got a committee hearing, with leadership saying the votes were not there. The obstacle is the three-fifths supermajority needed for a constitutional amendment plus long-standing opposition. Outlook: the November 2026 governor’s race could reset the 2027 session, since both frontrunners back letting voters decide.

Alaska

No legal sports betting. HB 145, proposing up to 10 mobile licenses with a 20 percent tax and Department of Revenue oversight, carried into 2026 with a Senate companion but has not advanced to a vote. Lawmakers question whether a state of roughly 740,000 residents can support a standalone regulator. Outlook: no breakthrough expected soon; any launch date would now be 2027 or later.

California

No legal sports betting. Two 2022 ballot measures, one tribal-backed and one commercial, both failed badly, drawing less than 20 percent and around 17 percent support. Tribal leaders have confirmed they are preparing an initiative for the 2028 ballot, built on a tribal-controlled framework. The obstacle is getting 100-plus tribes to agree on revenue sharing and market control, plus the governor’s opposition to online betting. The rise of prediction markets is adding urgency. Outlook: 2028 at the earliest.

Georgia

No legal sports betting, though it is the holdout closest to changing. In 2026, the House constitutional amendment (HR 450) failed on Crossover Day, 63 to 98, well short of the 120 needed, and the lottery-statute alternative (HB 910) also stalled. HB 910 would route mobile betting through the Georgia Lottery to avoid an amendment, and it is heavily backed by national operators but opposed by religious groups. Outlook: new bills expected in 2027, with a real chance within a few years.

Hawaii

No legal sports betting. HB 1308 made history in 2025 as the first Hawaii betting bill to pass both chambers before dying in conference committee over tax and operator terms; it carried into 2026 alongside a study group. Hawaii is one of only two states with no legal gambling of any kind. The obstacle is deep cultural resistance and law-enforcement opposition. Outlook: a refined bill is possible in 2027.

Idaho

No legal sports betting and no proposed legislation since 2018. Legalization would require a constitutional amendment with a two-thirds supermajority plus a voter referendum, and there is no organized proponent. Outlook: ranked among the least likely states to ever legalize.

Minnesota

No legal sports betting. The 2026 vehicle, SF 4139, would have issued up to 11 online licenses exclusively to tribes operating Class III gaming, but it stalled after a divided committee vote. The obstacle is the long-running standoff between tribes, who want exclusivity, and horse tracks and charitable-gaming interests. Outlook: likely reintroduction in 2027.

Oklahoma

No legal sports betting. In a major 2026 development, the House passed HB 1047 (tribal exclusivity) and HB 1101 (a backup referendum), and a late amendment won backing from a supermajority of tribes and the Oklahoma City Thunder, but the Senate voted HB 1047 down 27 to 21 in April. Governor Stitt favors an open commercial market over tribal exclusivity and threatened a veto. Outlook: 2027 at the earliest, possibly via a ballot referendum.

South Carolina

No legal sports betting and very limited legal gambling overall. S.444 got the state’s first-ever Senate hearing in February 2026, proposing up to eight online licenses, a 12.5 percent tax and an age-18 minimum under a new Sports Wagering Commission, but it did not advance out of subcommittee. The governor opposes expansion without a referendum. Outlook: analysts give it roughly a one-in-three chance, with a 2027 floor vote more likely.

Texas

No legal sports betting. The legislature meets only in odd years, and a 2023 resolution passed the House for the first time before dying in the Senate, where Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick controls the agenda and remains opposed. Legalization requires a constitutional amendment, meaning two-thirds support in each chamber plus a voter referendum. Outlook: the next opportunity is the session beginning January 2027, with any launch in late 2027 or 2028 at the earliest. As the second most populous state, Texas is a major untapped market.

Utah

No legal sports betting. Utah prohibits virtually all gambling, with no lottery and no casinos, and its statutes are designed to automatically ban anything the federal government legalizes. In 2026, lawmakers moved in the opposite direction, advancing a measure to write a prop-betting ban into the constitution, aimed at prediction markets. Outlook: the clearest permanent holdout, alongside its cultural opposition.

2026 Tracker

2026 Legislation Tracker

Sports betting legislation moves constantly. The table below tracks the most significant active and recent bills as of June 2026, including what each would do and the next hurdle it faces. Bill numbers and statuses change; always confirm with the relevant legislature.

StateBill or MeasureStatusNext Hurdle
OklahomaHB 1047 / HB 1101HB 1047 failed in Senate, 27-21 (April 2026)Possible 2027 bill or ballot referendum
GeorgiaHR 450 / HB 910Both failed in 2026 sessionNew bills expected 2027
TexasConstitutional amendmentNo session since 2023 House passageTwo-thirds vote in 2027, then referendum
MinnesotaSF 4139Stalled in committee (2026)Likely reintroduction 2027
South CarolinaS.444First Senate hearing held (Feb. 2026)Subcommittee vote, then floor
AlabamaSB 257No committee hearing (2026)Supermajority for amendment, then referendum
HawaiiHB 1308Passed both chambers 2025, died in conferenceRefined bill possible 2027
Nebraska2026 ballot initiativeSignature drive underwayQualify for Nov. 2026 ballot
MississippiHB 4074Passed House, died in Senate (2026)2027 session at earliest
VirginiaHB 1527Under debate (2026)Would allow in-state college betting at 50% tax
FederalSAFE Bet ActIntroduced in CongressWould set national advertising, affordability and AI rules
What’s Next

Where Legalization Could Happen Next

Beyond the states that have already legalized, a handful are closest to joining the map. The outlook below reflects legislative activity and political dynamics as of mid-2026.

Georgia

Arguably the most likely holdout to legalize soon. The 2026 lottery-route bill failed, but the approach of avoiding a constitutional amendment, combined with growing support including from professional franchises, makes a breakthrough within a few years plausible.

Nebraska and Missouri’s Lead

Missouri’s December 2025 launch shows the ballot-initiative path works. Nebraska is following it, with a well-funded 2026 petition drive aiming to put mobile betting on the November ballot.

Texas

A long-term prize given its size, but its odd-year calendar and amendment requirement mean the next real opportunity is the 2027 session, with a referendum to follow. Senate opposition remains the barrier.

California

The largest untapped market, dependent on tribes reaching agreement with national operators. After two failed 2022 measures, the earliest realistic path is a 2028 ballot initiative.

Minnesota and Oklahoma

Both have the building blocks but are stuck on tribal exclusivity questions. Each could move quickly if those disputes are resolved.

Tribal

Tribal Partnerships and Sports Betting

Native American tribes are central to the U.S. sports betting map, not just participants in it. Federally recognized tribes operate an estimated 525 tribal casinos nationwide, and their sovereign status lets them negotiate gaming compacts directly with states under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, or IGRA. In several states, tribes are the only legal place to bet.

How Tribal Betting Works

Tribal sports betting operates under Class III gaming compacts negotiated between a tribe and the state. In some states, like Arizona, Connecticut and Michigan, tribes partner with national operators to offer full statewide mobile betting alongside commercial operators. In others, like Washington, New Mexico, North Dakota and Wisconsin, tribes hold exclusive or near-exclusive rights, and betting is limited to tribal property or geofenced tribal apps. Florida is the most striking case: the Seminole Tribe holds exclusive statewide online rights, making its Hard Rock Bet the only legal sportsbook in the state.

Revenue Sharing Versus Taxation

Tribal gaming usually works differently from commercial taxation. Instead of paying a tax rate, tribes contribute a negotiated percentage of gaming revenue to state-designated funds. In Arizona, for example, the large majority of tribal gaming contributions support a state benefits fund. Tribal gaming commissions also maintain primary regulatory authority on their own lands, overseeing licensing and compliance. This model gives states a constitutionally sound path to legalization, which is why tribal negotiations are the deciding factor in states like California, Minnesota and Oklahoma.

Taxes

How Sports Betting Taxes Work

Sports betting taxation has two sides: the tax operators pay to the state, and the tax you owe on your own winnings. They are entirely separate, and confusing them is a common mistake.

Handle, GGR and AGR Explained

Three terms matter. Handle is the total amount wagered, the headline number regulators report. Gross gaming revenue, or GGR, is what is left after paying out winners, usually around 7 to 10 percent of handle, and it is the taxable base in most states. Adjusted gross revenue, or AGR, is GGR minus the deductions a state allows, such as promotional credits and free bets; in states that permit large deductions, operators pay tax on a smaller base than their true revenue.

What You Owe on Winnings

Your own winnings are taxable too, separately from what operators pay. The IRS treats gambling winnings as ordinary income, and sportsbooks may issue a tax form for larger payouts. Many states also tax winnings as income. You are responsible for reporting your winnings and keeping records regardless of whether a form is issued. This guide is informational and not tax advice; consult a tax professional about your situation.